Re: Jade and gcc-2.95

To: Jim Pick <jim@jimpick.com>
Cc: debian-sgml@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Jade and gcc-2.95
From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
Date: 17 Aug 1999 15:16:37 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] oapv0mrze2.fsf@burrito.fake>
In-reply-to: Jim Pick's message of "12 Aug 1999 20:06:05 -0700"
References: <[🔎] 87emh8pkwt.fsf@pepper.jimpick.com> <[🔎] E11F5zt-000294-00@burrito> <[🔎] 87aerwpeg2.fsf@pepper.jimpick.com>

FYI, this bug was fixed in jade 1.2.10, but probably in the wrong way.
This problem exists in OpenJade as well; I'm waiting for that source
to be fixed properly before uploading the new package for that.

--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>

Reply to:

References:
- Jade and gcc-2.95
  - From: Jim Pick <jim@jimpick.com>
- Re: Jade and gcc-2.95
  - From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
- Re: Jade and gcc-2.95
  - From: Jim Pick <jim@jimpick.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Jade and gcc-2.95
Next by Date: Re: Sven Rudolph: Re: still looking for someone to adopt sgml-tools?
Previous by thread: Re: Jade and gcc-2.95
Next by thread: Re: Jade and gcc-2.95
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread