Mandatory Access Control

To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Mandatory Access Control
From: c4p0 <capo@riseup.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:29:58 -0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 565B3616.70202@riseup.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAKkp-KTBvbPLDMMg9yJMatjCRwY1qd=i2eWEA=LDW7KVX+xFNw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87610pu5vs.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <[🔎] CAKkp-KQSMtHRJNUkYAXSDWCfhCHXoez2hDayTZOsnSDx4aESFg@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CAKTje6HEbLfkBMu3dj55+BQtEmHr=N819ctHQiTUoS_4hQ6OrQ@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CAKkp-KTBvbPLDMMg9yJMatjCRwY1qd=i2eWEA=LDW7KVX+xFNw@mail.gmail.com>

I read the fucking manuals but don't have clear what is the better
option of "Mandatory Access Control" for debian jessie.
(AppArmor, SElinux, tomoyo, etc ..)

someone can give me your opinion about it?
thanks in advance


-- 
A5B4 7CDF 17BD E9AD 7A78 092E 53F4 DDB5 A091 CB3B

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mandatory Access Control
  - From: Jason Fergus <leech@thefnords.org>
- Re: Mandatory Access Control
  - From: Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@gmail.com>

References:
- Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3405-1] smokeping security update
  - From: Fredrik Kers <fredrik.kers@netrounds.com>
- Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3405-1] smokeping security update
  - From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
- Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3405-1] smokeping security update
  - From: Fredrik Kers <fredrik.kers@netrounds.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3405-1] smokeping security update
Next by Date: Re: Mandatory Access Control
Previous by thread: Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3405-1] smokeping security update
Next by thread: Re: Mandatory Access Control
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread