Hi, On Dienstag, 15. Juli 2014, Michael Stone wrote: > Except that you haven't addressed *at all* why the current mechanism is > insufficient, except that you don't like it and want to do something > else instead. AIUI Hans-Christoph wants something else _also_, not instead. And technically I think those signed .debs even exist already, via hashes in signed .changes files. Or am I getting something wrong? cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.