[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: CVE-2009-3555 not addressed in OpenSSL



On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 02:13:37PM -0700, Kyle Bader wrote:
> > Debian, being a volunteer organization, has it's upsides and
> > downsides.  The downside here being without an active volunteer
> > interested in this problem, nothing has happened.
> >
> > What is needed here is someone to step up to the plate: file some bugs;
> > try to find the patches; backport and test them; etc.  Bottom line,
> > a little work and communication with maintainers of the affected
> > packages would go a long way toward resolving this.
> 
> That was my initial goal in initiating this conversation.  I provided
> a link to the patches already:
> 
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/jaunty/openssl/jaunty-proposed/revision/34

I seem to have missed that part in your original mail, and was not
aware of anybody that tried to backport the changes.

> I installed the jaunty package on my lenny machines and the ff error
> console warning is gone:
> 
> https://debian-lenny.badercom.net/
> 
> It appears to work but whenever a package as critical as openssl is
> modified it's important to have upstream take a look to make sure
> everything looks good.  Ubuntu may or may not have done this, I
> haven't done the leg work to figure that out but it looks like that
> could be the next step.  If I/we/whoever can verify this or gain the
> blessing of upstream would you consider updating the package Kurt if I
> also coordinate this with the Debian apache and nginx packagers?

I think there are also other packages affected by this.  This
probably includes atleast tor.  As I understand it they already
have some complex code to deal with various versions, you probably
want to have input from the maintainer if you want to fix this
in stable.

I will not have any time to look at this during the next month.
If someone wants to put some time in this and upload this to
proposed-updates and talk to the other maintainers so that this
can all be prepared for a next stable update, I would be happy.


Kurt


Reply to: