[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Broken signature for DSA-2040-1

On May/02, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Could it be a Sylpheed bug?

We've narrowed it down to an encoding issue: the original DSA email was
sent as ISO-8859-1, and mutt was able to verify it just fine; however,
on a system using UTF-8, any kind of pasting of the original text will
produce a file that gpg does not verify: that'll teach me to include the
"é" in my firstname instead of a plain "e" ;)



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: