* Javier Fernandez-Sanguino (jfs@debian.org) wrote: > Actually, I rather not have Nessus shipped with any other Debian > stable release as it is in the best interest of Debian and its users > to only provide software that is actively being maintained upstream. If someone picked it up to maintain it, I think a minimum requirement would be to figure out some way to keep it updated. If they're not going to do that, then they're not really maintaining it, imv. I'd think even DSA might want to step in at that point because of the concern you've described- false sense of security is worse than not knowing. Thanks, Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature