On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 00:14:45 -0400 Micah Anderson <micah@riseup.net> wrote: Thanks for your response, sorry about my delay getting back to you. > * Karl Goetz <karl@kgoetz.id.au> [2009-06-01 23:31-0400]: > > The suggestion in #vserver was "if you manage to get a host path on > > a recent (non broken, i.e. non-debian :) kernel and util-vserver, > > then it is considered a bug and will be fixed ASAP ... because that > > basically means that the namespace isolation is not working > > properly" > > > > Is this a valid bug? Is there some debianisms involved that could > > cause the issues, or is it just another upstream who doesnt like > > "unoffical" packages? :) > > Only one way to find out, build a vanilla upstream, with the patch and > find out. > > However, I cannot reproduce what you have seen, using the same > kernel. Odd. I've just done it again, using the same two vhosts. (sorry about the wrapping) sidvs:~/debomatic/Debomatic# wesnoth:~# mv /home/vservers/sidvs/root/debomatic /home/vservers/autobuilders/root/ sidvs:~/debomatic/Debomatic# cd .. sidvs:/home/vservers/sidvs/vservers/autobuilders/root/debomatic# wesnoth is the host. Ah well, I might let this one slip past - I dont have time or inclination to build upstreams releases atm. > > micah > > ps - upstream doesn't like unofficial packages either :) > Such is life! kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature