* Karl Goetz <karl@kgoetz.id.au> [2009-06-01 23:31-0400]: > The suggestion in #vserver was "if you manage to get a host path on a > recent (non broken, i.e. non-debian :) kernel and util-vserver, then it > is considered a bug and will be fixed ASAP ... because that basically > means that the namespace isolation is not working properly" > > Is this a valid bug? Is there some debianisms involved that could cause > the issues, or is it just another upstream who doesnt like "unoffical" > packages? :) Only one way to find out, build a vanilla upstream, with the patch and find out. However, I cannot reproduce what you have seen, using the same kernel. micah ps - upstream doesn't like unofficial packages either :)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature