On Tuesday 19 August 2008 02:07, Ewen McNeill wrote: > It appears that this security patched package actually has an older > version number than the one in Debian Etch base. Yes, this was an oversight, perhaps because the Postfix maintainer doesn't use i386 and therefore missed the binNMU. All other archs are fine though. > Would it be possible to rerelease this fix for Debian Etch with a > higher package version number? Either 2.3.8-3etch1 or 2.3.8-2+b1etch1 > or similar would seem to do. This has just been done as 2.3.8-2+etch1. Thijs
Attachment:
pgpdY49B5TanP.pgp
Description: PGP signature