Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Wouldn't one of the goals of the change to just one name instead of two > per issue be to facilitate things like googling, grepping and other > searching on CVE id's? Then it would make sense to unify the names as > widely as possibe. It's not worth worrying about doing, unless you previously worried about doing it on a per-CAN basis, as CANs were one at a time promoted to CVEs. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature