Re: On Mozilla-* updates
Frans Pop <email@example.com> writes:
> On Thursday 04 August 2005 00:25, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> What is wrong with volatile? It's for exactly this case.
> No it is not. volatile-sloppy  may be (if that's implemented).
>  http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/05/msg00016.html
I read that, and I read more importantly volatile.debian.net, and I
don't see any indication there of why gaim upgrades (or mozilla ones)
are not allowed in volatile.