Re: On Mozilla-* updates

To: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Cc: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: On Mozilla-* updates
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 15:39:19 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 87d5ouir1k.fsf@becket.becket.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200508040033.51632.aragorn@tiscali.nl> (Frans Pop's message of "Thu, 4 Aug 2005 00:33:51 +0200")
References: <[🔎] D0B6C1BAE46CD711B8E70048545A2AC90C9232@pop.ga.lan> <[🔎] 87u0i6iroe.fsf@becket.becket.net> <[🔎] 200508040033.51632.aragorn@tiscali.nl>

Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl> writes:

> On Thursday 04 August 2005 00:25, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> What is wrong with volatile?  It's for exactly this case.
>
> No it is not. volatile-sloppy [1] may be (if that's implemented).
>
> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/05/msg00016.html

I read that, and I read more importantly volatile.debian.net, and I
don't see any indication there of why gaim upgrades (or mozilla ones)
are not allowed in volatile.  

Thomas

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: On Mozilla-* updates
  - From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>

References:
- RE: On Mozilla-* updates
  - From: Mathieu JANIN <Matt@tgcaen.dyndns.biz>
- Re: On Mozilla-* updates
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: On Mozilla-* updates
  - From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: On Mozilla-* updates
Next by Date: Re: On Mozilla-* updates
Previous by thread: Re: On Mozilla-* updates
Next by thread: Re: On Mozilla-* updates
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread