* Christian Storch: >> That might be a possibility--an unstable/testing model for the security >> archive. > > I think we would need a new distribution e.g. 'sec-stable' for testing > new security patches. So someone would be able to choose between > 'more stable but less secure' > or > 'less stable but more secure'. Maybe stable-proposed-updates could be reused, but I don't know what the current users expect to find in this archive.