On May 27, 2004, at 2:15 PM, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
On 5/27/2004, Luk Claes wrote:You should check the website www.d-o/security/nonvulns-woody At least 4 of the 5 you mention are listed there...Luk -- thank you! Somehow I had no idea that web page existed...
Nor did I. It's very good that it's there. However, I am wondering what the specific reasons are that Woody is not vulnerable to those particular vulnerabilities. Are there pages explaining that? (Maybe they should be linked to from that page. [hint hint wink wink])
Thanks all.