Re: base-passwd bug?

To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: base-passwd bug?
From: Jussi Ekholm <ekhowl@goa-head.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 02:35:23 +0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 20021013233523.GC3386@erpland>
Mail-followup-to: debian-security@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1034294734.9808.3.camel@doneill>
References: <[🔎] UO7ZV071Z4JH86ECC0HGOMJDW43LH.3da5f1a1@MOIRAINE> <[🔎] 20021010201240.GA11112@zensunni> <[🔎] 20021010202438.GC28407@erpland> <[🔎] 87ofa1n97m.fsf@frodo.epkowa.co.jp> <[🔎] 1034294734.9808.3.camel@doneill>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Daniel O'Neill <doneill@thelodgingco.com> wrote:
> I had the same problem.  This kind of initiative by the package
> shouldn't be so passive.  It should be corrected, or one might find
> themselves frustrated.

I'm sorry, I didn't quite understand what you mean. What problem did
you have? It may be "the language barrier", but I just couldn't
comprehend correctly of what you say above. I apologize, but could you
rephrase?

- -- 
Jussi Ekholm <ekhowl@goa-head.org> | <http://erppimaa.ihku.org/> | <0x1410081E>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9qgM7AtEARxQQCB4RAjj+AJ9lY8sY9bBBCPMQq0ZBgc5+K31YDACeLzTi
lSuydxY6IYlGG6F4g/SXCvk=
=MbfS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to:

References:
- base-passwd bug?
  - From: Kisteleki Róbert <kistel@webtime.net>
- Re: base-passwd bug?
  - From: "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <dm@zensunni.demon.nl>
- Re: base-passwd bug?
  - From: Jussi Ekholm <ekhowl@goa-head.org>
- Re: base-passwd bug?
  - From: Olaf Meeuwissen <olaf@epkowa.co.jp>
- Re: base-passwd bug?
  - From: Daniel O'Neill <doneill@thelodgingco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: base-passwd bug?
Next by Date: Re: a nessus developpers joke?
Previous by thread: Re: base-passwd bug?
Next by thread: Re: base-passwd bug?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread