This one time, Lupe Christoph wrote: > Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't we expect people who run unstable to > diagnoseproblems themselves? If they can't they should be running stable > or at least testing? I think there's nothing wrong with helping someone out, no matter which group they're running. Why should it matter? Isn't this mailing list called debian-security? Not debian-security-stable. > Unstable is not just a name... Neither is testing nor stable :) -Anne -- .-"".__."``". Anne Carasik, System Administrator .-.--. _...' (/) (/) ``' gator at cacr dot caltech dot edu (O/ O) \-' ` -="""=. ', Center for Advanced Computing Research ~`~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Attachment:
pgpRCMaDL3rTr.pgp
Description: PGP signature