[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: log analyze applications



Thanks folks, for all suggestions !

Well, I'm going to tune my logcheck now
and of course I'll keep eyes open, and brain smart,
for further solutions...

...anyway nothing is better than a good tuned application :)

Thanks again,
have a nice time,

 - Ivo

On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 16:22, eim wrote:
> log analyze applications
> ========================
> 
> Hallo to everyone on the debian-security list.
> 
> I've got some questions related to log analyzing applications,
> actually on my debian server boxes I've installed and configured
> software like...
> 
> 	* logcheck	(System Log Analyzer)
> 	* snort		(Intrusion Detection System)
> 	* ippl		(IP protocols logger)
> 
> 
> All these apps. check my system for security alerts, malfunctions,
> network activity and so on... everything works quite well, the
> only problem is: they generate *REALLY* much mail traffic with
> lots of output which I can't read all.
> 
> So my question is, has anyone a good solution for checking
> syslogs, netlogs, etc. in order to have a simple and strict
> overview of system activities ?
> 
> Are there any tools which are smarter, faster and cleaner
> as my combination of log analyze apps. ?
> 
> Thanks for any suggestions !
>  
>  - Ivo Marino
> 
> -- 
> 
>  »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »«
>  Ivo Marino                    eim@eimbox.org
>  UN*X Developer, running Debian GNU/Linux
>  irc.OpenProjects.net #debian
>  http://eimbox.org/~eim     http://eimbox.org
>  »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »«
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 
-- 

 »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »«
 Ivo Marino                    eim@eimbox.org
 UN*X Developer, running Debian GNU/Linux
 irc.OpenProjects.net #debian
 http://eimbox.org/~eim     http://eimbox.org
 »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »« »«



Reply to: