Re: icmp: type-#69 (catched that bastard)
Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <email@example.com> writes:
>> OK. Either we have asymmetric routing or that packet is spoofed from
>> something that's really 17 hops away in order to get your network (hence
>> the broadcast) to attack a box that's really 19 hops away. Or the box is
>> emitting dodgy packets itself (less likely).
> The thing I wonder about is: who knows how to answer to a icmp type-#69?
> Worms? Root kits?
I can't name one, but that doesn't say an awful lot. Googling for `ICMP
"type 69"' doesn't lead to any obvious results, either. :(