On Sun, Sep 15, 2002 at 02:47:38PM +0200, Lupe Christoph wrote: > On Sunday, 2002-09-15 at 13:03:42 +0100, Tim Haynes wrote: Hello > > > You're right, ICMP type 69 is pretty darn' invalid - a quick `ipchains -h > > icmp' makes it obvious that the highest valid ICMP type is 18. > > According to http://www.cotse.com/icmptypes.html, the highest used ICMP > type code is 40. RFC1700 lists code up to 36. > > Maybe somebody is using type 69 in some product, without registering at > the IANA? Once i heard about project of internet worm comunicating through odd ICMP packets. This seems to be quite strange, but after all this is a good and relativly discrete communicating channel... Sorry if i'm totaly wrong ... ;) > Lupe Christoph -- Michael "carstein" Melewski | "One day, he said, in a taped segment firstname.lastname@example.org | that suggested chemical interrogation, mobile: 502 545 913 | everything had gone gray." gpg: carstein.c.pl/carstein.txt | -- Corto , 'Neuromancer'
Description: PGP signature