[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: glibc_2.2.5-9.woody.4.deb is missing

On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 05:55:17PM +0200, Thomas Buhk wrote:
> > locales because the  glibc_2.2.5-9.woody.4.deb would be 
> > missing. I had a 
> hm... no problem this morning on several systems, all work fine with
> 'apt-get update; apt-get upgrade'

But did locales get removed?

There is no glibc deb.

The problem is that locales 2.2.5-9.woody.4 depends on
glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4, while libc6 2.2.5-9.woody.4 provides

Methinks the naming is getting a bit complicated.  Why do we continue
to refer to to the GNU C library as both libc6 and glibc?


To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: