[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re: Apt-get is insecure



There is a list of "official mirrors" available at:

http://www.debian.org/misc/README.mirrors

Downloading your packages from any other site than on 
listed on this page significantly increases your odds of 
downloading an unofficial package (IE: Trojan Horse...)

Regards,

Phil

> On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> 
> > 
> > There is a seperate plan for verifying signatures using 
apt. From
> > memory this goes as follows:
> > 
> > * deb packages are installed in the archive
> > * the MD5 checksum for each package is listed in the 
Packages file
> > * the MD5 checksum for each Packages file for a release 
is listed in
> >   the Release file
> > * the archive creates a signature for the Release file 
that apt can
> >   verify
> > 
> Hi,
> 
> 	Forgive me if my question is rather naive. I have 
the following
> scenario and am curious to know whethere this has already 
been addressed :
> 
> 1.  Mr. Cracker sets up a mirror and claims it is a 
mirror for Debian
> distros.
> 2.  Mr. Cracker recompiles trojaned packages and 
recomputes the MD5
> checksums for them. These trojaned .debs are placed on 
the mirror.
> 
> 	How would a person getting .debs from this mirror 
be able to
> protect him/herself from such a situation? Would they 
have to exclusively
> get .debs from the Debian site itself?
> 
> 	Note that if the packages are PGP / GPG signed, the 
problem is
> only a little less acute. Mr. Cracker could sign the 
package with his /
> her key. How would a user know that Mr. Cracker is not 
infact the
> maintainer?
> 
> Regards,
> Jor-el
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-
request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact 
listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 




Reply to: