Re: Apt-get is insecure

To: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>, debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Apt-get is insecure
From: Emiel Metselaar <e.d.metselaar@phys.rug.nl>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 17:11:21 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] E16EYS9-0002IA-00@mkiglo6>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20011213152447.GV14968@wiggy.net>
References: <[🔎] 20011213172418.A25716@karjala.org> <[🔎] 20011213152447.GV14968@wiggy.net>

On Thursday 13 December 2001 16:24, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Alexander Karelas wrote:
> > RedHat uses a PGP signature scheme. What are we doing about it?
>
> apt-get install debsign
>
> Wichert.

Could anyone point me to some documentation about how this fits within
the 'usual' apt-get update apt-get install procedure. 

Emiel

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apt-get is insecure
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>

References:
- Apt-get is insecure
  - From: Alexander Karelas <karjala_lists@yahoo.co.uk>
- Re: Apt-get is insecure
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Apt-get is insecure
Next by Date: Re: Apt-get is insecure
Previous by thread: Re: Apt-get is insecure
Next by thread: Re: Apt-get is insecure
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread