Re: Questions regarding the Security Secretary Position
On 22 Oct 2001, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>John Galt <email@example.com> writes:
>> The whole problem here is they DIDN'T ask you. You threw in your two
>> cents worth without a corresponding pledge of support.
>It's a public mailing list, and I was simply contributing my
>suggestion. You decided it should be a big Federal case.
I find that hilarious coming from you. Didn't you once try to muzzle
myself and another on -legal, claiming that lists.debian.org wasn't a
public resource? Hypocrite.
>I'll make you a deal. When you rudely say "shut up", I'll pay
>attention if you return the favor when I say shut up to you.
Yeah, sure. You have yet to back that statement with lack of words...
>> No, but you DO make yourself a hypocrite for calling ME obstructionist...
>> Compared to you, I'm a piker in this context apparently.
>I'm not trying to obstruct anything.
No, you're just making "reasonable suggestions" after the fact. Whatever,
if you can't figure that what you're doing is being obstructionist, there
ain't nothing I'm going to tell you that will change it, even if I could.
Be Careful! I have a black belt in sna-fu!
Who is John Galt? firstname.lastname@example.org