On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Rene Mayrhofer wrote: > files in there. Another small question: Is it better to have different .d > directories (for ignore, violations, violations.ignore and hacking) or having > one .d directory and using filename-postfixes (e.g. postfix.ignore, > postfix.violations, postfix.violations.ignore, postfix.hacking). In the latter > case, the handling (for logcheck) is a bit more complex and leads to errors > (files not found when the postfix is not 100% correct, ...), but does not need a > bunch of directories ? > I would prefer different directories, but I am open to any suggestions. What do > you think ? Well, I personally would prefer just one directory. However, if you want to use more than one, then PLEASE have them all branching from a single directory. e.g: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d /etc/logcheck/violations.d ... This helps to keep /etc/ manageable (it's quite full already) :) -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh
Attachment:
pgpGtJVpZEIb_.pgp
Description: PGP signature