Re: GNOME security.

To: Ethan Benson <erbenson@alaska.net>
Cc: Sergio Brandano <sb@dcs.qmw.ac.uk>, debian-security@lists.debian.org, sb@dcs.qmw.ac.uk
Subject: Re: GNOME security.
From: Sergio Brandano <sb@dcs.qmw.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 13:44:14 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 200003221344.NAA21058@copper.dcs.qmw.ac.uk>
In-reply-to: Message from Ethan Benson <erbenson@alaska.net> of "Wed, 22 Mar 2000 04:33:07 -0900." <[🔎] 20000322043307.F2677@plato.localdomain.local>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0003220123500.29661-100000@cornerstone.core.aoi> <[🔎] 20000322123633.E25188@mors.wiggy.net> <wichert@cistron.nl> <[🔎] 200003221324.NAA19938@copper.dcs.qmw.ac.uk> <[🔎] 20000322043307.F2677@plato.localdomain.local>

>saft is controlled from /etc/inetd.conf at least it was when i somehow

 I can see it depends on inetd, by running netstat -anp | egrep 487,
 but i see no reference to it in the /etc/init.d files.

>ended up with it.  printer is lpd, /etc/init.d/lprng stop.  X11 is

 done!

>opened whenever you start X, no way around that, a ipchains rule is
>the best way to deal with X IMO. Netbus and nterm, no idea.

 Nterm depends on gnome-session
 Netbus is good, as it depends on fakebo.

 Is there a way of killing nterm?

 Sergio

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GNOME security.
  - From: Ethan Benson <erbenson@alaska.net>

References:
- GNOME security.
  - From: Alexander Hvostov <vulture@aoi.dyndns.org>
- Re: GNOME security.
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>
- Re: GNOME security.
  - From: Sergio Brandano <sb@dcs.qmw.ac.uk>
- Re: GNOME security.
  - From: Ethan Benson <erbenson@alaska.net>

Prev by Date: Re: GNOME security.
Next by Date: Re: GNOME security.
Previous by thread: Re: GNOME security.
Next by thread: Re: GNOME security.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread