On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:32:50 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: > Hi all, > do I understand correctly that DSA-2173-1 [1][2] fixes > TEMP-0603436-5CA466 [3] ? > > If this is the case, I think the tracker should be updated to be aware > of the link between the DSA and vulnerability... > > Or am I completely off-track? We don't have a way to link temp names to the DSA list (yet). I have entered the fixed version info however. Mike