On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 21:32:28 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: > On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 21:22:20 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: > > [...] > > As soon as I find the time to do so, I will go through the "squeeze is > > born" inconsistencies again and report which ones are still relevant: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-tracker/2009/02/msg00008.html > > > > Obviously enough, if you (or anyone else!) are willing to fix some of > > them in the meanwhile, it would be highly appreciated! ;-) > > Here's a list of the inconsistencies that are still present: > > http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2008-5236 > http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2008-5242 > http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2008-5239 > http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2008-5234 > http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2008-5241 > http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2008-5240 > http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2008-5237 > http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2009-0316 > http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2008-4098 I can confirm that all the above inconsistencies are now fixed. Thank you very much. -- On some search engines, searching for my nickname AND "nano-documents" may lead you to my website... ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpSZDANRGwO2.pgp
Description: PGP signature