On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 21:22:20 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > As soon as I find the time to do so, I will go through the "squeeze is > born" inconsistencies again and report which ones are still relevant: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-tracker/2009/02/msg00008.html > > Obviously enough, if you (or anyone else!) are willing to fix some of > them in the meanwhile, it would be highly appreciated! ;-) Here's a list of the inconsistencies that are still present: http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2008-5236 http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2008-5242 http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2008-5239 http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2008-5234 http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2008-5241 http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2008-5240 http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2008-5237 http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2009-0316 http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2008-4098 As I said, these are cases where a vulnerability is still considered as unfixed in squeeze and fixed in lenny at the same time, with both suites having the *same exact* package version. -- On some search engines, searching for my nickname AND "nano-documents" may lead you to my website... ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpqjLo0JFFFw.pgp
Description: PGP signature