[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: "cupsys" renamed to "cups", please adjust your (build-)depends



Hi Florian,
* Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> [2008-06-16 09:53]:
> * Florian Weimer:
> 
> >> If I add cupsys to the removed-packages file is an
> >> additional <removed> tag in CVE/list still needed?
> >
> > Yes, otherwise the issue is not marked as unfixed for etch et al.
> 
> There seems to have been a misunderstanding: It is not necessary (and
> even wrong) to change the version numbers on historic entries.  You only
> should use <removed> for new vulnerabilities.

Aaaaah true, my bad. I'll fix this when I back home again.

Cheers
Nico
-- 
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - nion@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.

Attachment: pgpaYUhWnuFzp.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: