[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: "cupsys" renamed to "cups", please adjust your (build-)depends

Hi Florian,
(args, I initially sent my mail to security-tracker and just 
bounced it to this list then).
* Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> [2008-06-13 11:21]:
> * Nico Golde:
> > * Martin Pitt <mpitt@debian.org> [2008-06-12 18:06]:
> >> after many years of calling our CUPS package "cupsys" it has finally
> >> be renamed to the proper upstream name "cups", including init scripts,
> >> library packages, etc. This makes us compatible again with all the
> >> upstream documentation out there, unbreaks the LSB printer driver
> >> packages from openprinting.org, reduces confusion with users, and
> >> finally makes the libraries Policy compliant (SONAME == package name).
> >> Please see http://bugs.debian.org/482296 for details.
> > [...] 
> > Any idea on how to change the tracker information according 
> > to that?
> The source package has been renamed.  This means that cupsys should be
> added to the removed-packages file at some point.  Vulnerabilities
> should be marked as <removed> for unstable and cupsys, and as <unfixed>
> for cups (or annotated with the proper version).

If I add cupsys to the removed-packages file is an
additional <removed> tag in CVE/list still needed?

Kind regards

Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - nion@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.

Attachment: pgpCIMx3S48gl.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: