[Fwd: Bug#921214: ed2k-hash: Incorrect hashes on amd64]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hello Team,
just want to let you know I am working on this.
Cheers,
Sven
- -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Von: Josef Vitu <josef@vitu.org>
Antwort an: Josef Vitu <josef@vitu.org>, 921214@bugs.debian.org
An: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Betreff: Bug#921214: ed2k-hash: Incorrect hashes on amd64
Datum: Sun, 03 Feb 2019 09:21:29 +0100
> Package: ed2k-hash
> Version: 0.4.0+ds-1
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch upstream
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> the hashes computed by ed2k-hash version 0.4.0+ds-1 differ from the
> ones computed by other software
> (such as RHash) and also some older versions of the same package.
> This issue is exactly the same
> as in #562833 and the same patch fixes it:
>
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-p2p/ed2k_hash/files/ed2k_64bit.patch?rev=1.1&view=log
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: buster/sid
> APT prefers testing
> APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500,
> 'testing-debug'), (400, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1,
> 'experimental')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> Foreign Architectures: i386
>
> Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8),
> LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
>
> Versions of packages ed2k-hash depends on:
> ii libc6 2.28-5
>
> ed2k-hash recommends no packages.
>
> ed2k-hash suggests no packages.
>
> -- debconf-show failed
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=8eLo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: