Re: arno-iptables-firewall 2.0.3-1~rc4
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hello Samuel,
$gbp buildpackage --git-pbuilder --git-dist=stretch
on branch debian/master fails with
[...]
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy : Depends: debhelper (>= 12) but it is
not going to be installed
Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up...
[...]
while
$ gbp buildpackage --git-pbuilder --git-dist=sid
builds successfully.
This seems to convince me we have to roll back the DH level for
stretch.
Best,
Sven
On Tuesday, den 15.01.2019, 19:36 +0100 Sven Geuer wrote:
> Hello Samuel,
>
> On Monday, 14.01.2019, 21:08 +0000 Samuel Henrique wrote:
> > Hello Sven,
> >
> > 1. prepare a 2.0.3-1~bpo9+1. This would only require DH level to be
> > > rolled back to 11.
> > >
> >
> > I'm lost here, why do we need to roll back to DH 11?
>
> I believe so as DH on stretch does not support level 12 according to
> the manpage [1]. In case that's not relevant ...
>
> >
> > > 2. prepare a 2.0.1.f-2 from 2.0.1.f-1.1 patched for Bug #824684.
> > > This
> > > could be a minimal change leaving all the older packaging flaws
> > > in
> > > place.
> > >
> >
> > Let's just backport 2.0.3-1.
>
> ... I would branch a debian/stretch-bpo from 2.0.3-1 and prepare
> d/changelog accordingly. Or is this something I complete have to
> leave
> to you?
>
> Best,
> Sven
>
> [1] https://manpages.debian.org/stretch/debhelper/debhelper.7.en.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=xFaj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: