Re: arno-iptables-firewall 2.0.3-1~rc4

[Sven Geuer <debmaint@g-e-u-e-r.de>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hello Team,

regarding the statement 

> Now it starts on system boot.

and the question

> Is it an idea to upload this new package to stretch-backports?

I see two ways to go:

1. prepare a 2.0.3-1~bpo9+1. This would only require DH level to be
rolled back to 11.

2. prepare a 2.0.1.f-2 from 2.0.1.f-1.1 patched for Bug #824684. This
could be a minimal change leaving all the older packaging flaws in
place.

What is the preferred approach in your opinion?

Best,
Sven

Am On Saturday, 12.01.2019, 18:54 +0100 Odd Martin Baanrud wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Upgrading to the latest version of arno-iptables-firewall worked
> fine.
> Now it starts on system boot.
> Thanks for a real cleanup!
> 
> Is it an idea to upload this new package to stretch-backports?
> It shouldn’t be a problem, since nothing has been changed in the
> configuration area.
> 
> Regards, Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Y0P8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----