Maintain iptables as part of the pkg-security team
- Subject: Maintain iptables as part of the pkg-security team
- From: samueloph@gmail.com (Samuel Henrique)
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 22:24:36 -0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] CABwkT9qVRAv=WL-sQ=6oYq5Cg4WvCytrCVYP++TXGHoHyrZY6Q@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <CAOkSjBioufF2GM3_02iwKShUkCEHjTpzVyk5fHX+9Z1PGOGqiQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CABwkT9rXooxhHdGtf662LzDkJGKCs3hn6kEr34Ddd-m81Zo5_A@mail.gmail.com> <CAOkSjBioufF2GM3_02iwKShUkCEHjTpzVyk5fHX+9Z1PGOGqiQ@mail.gmail.com>
?Hello all,?
2016-11-23 5:46 GMT-02:00 Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo at debian.org>:
> On 23 November 2016 at 00:39, Samuel Henrique <samueloph at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello Arturo and Laurence,
> >
> > I would like to offer you to join the pkg-security team and to maintain
> > iptables as part of the team. That would make cooperation easier and
> would
> > offer some backup maintenance power in case you are not available.
> >
> > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/pkg-security
> >
> > I would also like to ask to become one of the uploaders of iptables.
> >
>
> Thanks for your interest.
>
> I don't see it necessary right now.
>
> In fact, the plan is to create a netfilter-related packaging team in
> the future. But this plan is also stalled by now.
?I just saw that you already has iptables's packaging under pkg-netfilter :)
Well, in this case, are you willing to accept a new uploader?
There are some changes to iptables packaging i would like to see
implemented, having a first glance at the current state of the package i
can say at least using BINDNOW (hardening+=all), bumping DH to 10 (using
parallel builds) and making use of "-*Wl*,--as--*needed*?" on d/rules. Oh,
also iptables does not build twice (unless building from the git repo)
because d/clean needs some adjustments.
I already joined the mailing list and applied for pkg-netfilter on alioth.
?Regards,?
Samuel Henrique <samueloph>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-security-team/attachments/20161130/82fe5f9b/attachment-0001.html>
Reply to: