[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: nlohmann-json3-dev need to be reverted to trixie version



On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 03:53:00PM +0000, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> >You should have closed them in the upload.
> 
> yes my bad, but in any case better an extra check from somebody else hands, I
> did a *lot* of work on this package, so I might have missed many things...
> A double check on the sanity of the resulting binary is appreciated :)

Done, I have rebuild everything locally to check that there is no FTBFS and
closed the bugs.
 
> >Well, precisely, in experimental, the source package name is still called nlohmann-json3
> 
> that one was to test the new autopkgtests, I'm speaking about the experimental branch, the one I'm building right now
> 
> >Again this is not an option. All you will achieve is packages vendoring
> >nlohmann-json3 instead of using the package. 
> >
> >The only option is to work with upstream to commit to a fixed ABI. There is no
> >point going round and round.
> Something already nackd by upstream, maybe you can help?
> https://github.com/nlohmann/json/issues/4926

I cannot, I do not have a GitHub account.

But I have a question:

Why is Hubert Chathi listed as maintainer of this package ?

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 


Reply to: