Re: nlohmann-json3-dev need to be reverted to trixie version
Hello,
>You should have closed them in the upload.
yes my bad, but in any case better an extra check from somebody else hands, I did a *lot* of work on this package, so I might have missed many things...
A double check on the sanity of the resulting binary is appreciated :)
>Well, precisely, in experimental, the source package name is still called nlohmann-json3
that one was to test the new autopkgtests, I'm speaking about the experimental branch, the one I'm building right now
>Again this is not an option. All you will achieve is packages vendoring
>nlohmann-json3 instead of using the package.
>
>The only option is to work with upstream to commit to a fixed ABI. There is no
>point going round and round.
Something already nackd by upstream, maybe you can help?
https://github.com/nlohmann/json/issues/4926
G.
Reply to: