Re: nlohmann-json3-dev need to be reverted to trixie version

[Bill Allombert <ballombe@debian.org>]

On Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 02:42:05PM +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On 2025-09-20 13:18, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 07:52:16AM +0000, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> > > 
> > > How do we move forward? Ok also to create a nlohmann-json3-3.12-dev or
> > > whatever, but I guess this one (3.11) should also go away as soon as
> > > possible, and let people migrate to the new one.
> > 
> > Call it nlohmann-json3.12.0-dev, no need to duplicate the '3'.
> > Unfortunately it will need to Conflicts/Replaces (but not Provides)
> > nlohmann-json3-dev.
> 
> How unstable is this ABI issue?  Is the minor version really needed in the
> package name?
> Would nlohmann-json3.12-dev not be sufficient?

[[If you are interested, please read the discussion from the start, no need to
restart from scratch]]

The issue is precisely that upstream hardcode the full version string in the ABI
(in typename).

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here.