On 2025-09-20 13:18, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 07:52:16AM +0000, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:How do we move forward? Ok also to create a nlohmann-json3-3.12-dev or whatever, but I guess this one (3.11) should also go away as soon as possible, and let people migrate to the new one.Call it nlohmann-json3.12.0-dev, no need to duplicate the '3'. Unfortunately it will need to Conflicts/Replaces (but not Provides) nlohmann-json3-dev.
How unstable is this ABI issue? Is the minor version really needed in the package name?
Would nlohmann-json3.12-dev not be sufficient? Drew