[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Is the chemical media type still used?



Hi,

I was under the impression that chemistry/* was long ago (1998) proposed and registered by Peter Murray-Rust and Henry Rzepa.
"The Application of Chemical Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (Chemical MIME) Internet Standards to Electronic Mail and World Wide Web Information Exchange"
https://doi.org/10.1021/ci9803233 
Their initial MIME table is at:
https://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/rzepa/jcics/ 

Some of these types (e.g. VMD) are perhaps application-specific. But there are a large number of interchange formats in chemistry used by many formats, and I believe are still in widespread use (including clipboard types):
.mol / .sdf            chemical/x-mdl-molfile
.cif                       chemical/x-cif
.xyz                     chemical/x-xyz
.pdb                    chemical/x-pdb
.cml                     chemical/x-cml
.fch / .fchk           chemical/x-formatted-checkpoint
.cub / .cube         chemical/x-cube
.jdx                       chemical/x-jcamp-dx
.spc                      chemical/x-galactic-spc
.smi / .smiles        chemical/x-smiles

I can think of probably another 5-10 interchange formats that weren’t on that list in 1998 (.mol2 comes to mind) that don’t seem like a good for for application/* because they’re not application-specific.

Anyway, if chemical/* hasn’t officially been registered(!?) it’s news to me and I’m sure Peter and Henry among others can help.

Best regards,
-Geoff

 ---
Prof. Geoffrey Hutchison (he/him)
Department of Chemistry
University of Pittsburgh
tel: (412) 648-0492
email: geoffh@pitt.edu
web: https://hutchisonlab.org/ 


On Sep 4, 2025 at 5:04:11 AM, Drew Parsons <dparsons@emerall.com> wrote:
It's a good question.
Good idea to keep the media types up to date.

One of the applications using the chemical media types could be Avogadro
(and openbabel).
I'm cc:ing the developer, Geoff Hutchison, who may have some thoughts
and opinions on the question.

Geoff: this question has been raised on the Debian Science mailing list,
https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/.  Andrius Merkys made a reply
in-thread, https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2025/09/msg00001.html

Drew Parsons


On 2025-09-03 15:12, Charles Plessy wrote:
Hi all,

I am preparing the next update of the `media-types` package, which
provides the `/etc/mime.types` file.

We have been listing chemical media types in this file since 2003.  
This
left a lot of time for software and their file formats to be
progressively replaced.  For instance, in my understanding, the `.chm`
(chemical/x-chemdraw) extension used to be used by ChemDraw, but was
then taken over by Windows and now ChemDraw uses a different format,
`.cdxml` (application/vnd.chemdraw+xml).

A bunch of chemical media types are problematic because they declare
file extensions that are taken by other media types, and many software
parsing `/etc/mime.types` have difficulty to handle this.  One way they
solve the problem, for instance, is to ignore some or all chemical
media
types.

It is my goal to progresively make `/etc/mime.types` closer and closer
to the data available at
https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/media-types.xhtml,
including by registering missing types
(https://www.iana.org/form/media-types)
and by removing legacy extra types that lost relevance.

If the chemical top-level media type is still relevant, maybe some
people on this list would like to register it to the IANA?  A recent
RFC
was written about how to do such registration, and it mentions
awareness
of the type (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9694.html).

If the chemical media type is not relevant anymore, I would like to
remove it.

What are your thoughts?

Have a nice day,

Charles

Reply to: