Aw: Re: Aw: Re: Aw: Aw: Re: Packaging of Apache Arrow - where are we?
> Gesendet: Samstag, 23. August 2025 um 02:13
> Von: "Diane Trout" <diane@ghic.org>
> An: "Steffen Möller" <steffen_moeller@gmx.de>, debian-science@lists.debian.org
> Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: Aw: Aw: Re: Packaging of Apache Arrow - where are we?
>
> >
> > Yes, please have a look. I suggest we start with a very core of the
> > software (C++ and Python) and then see who wants to join with
> > additional
> > languages.
>
>
> I figured out the reason it didn't build on i386 was the multiarch
> paths were hard coded in d/rules. I fixed that and tested it locally.
> I've pushed the fix to salsa, though I haven't seen the results yet.
>
> (There was some missing dependencies in the python autopkgtest that I
> also fixed in an earlier commit)
>
Excellent!
I am experimenting with building the r-cran-arrow package also from the
same source tree. We break the "r-cran-"-semantics just slightly that way,
but I guess it is the most practical to keep the versions in sync.
On a sidenote, when linking the R package (from CRAN with the tools subdir
removed) against the arrow C++ library then I get a link error wrt some
Hive objects. Are there some files omitted from building the library?
Cheers,
Steffen
Reply to: