[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ITP: python3-qutip-{core,qip,qtrl,qoc}, python-qutip-core-{core,qip,qtrl,qoc}



On 2025-03-31 19:01, Dirk Lehmann wrote:
Hello Drew =)

I don't think python-qutip-core-doc is necessary.
There is already a python-qutip-doc package, and it's still the right place for the core docs.

You are right, there is one `-doc` too much. Hmmm, in my concept it would be better to drop `python-qutip-doc` as the last step of migration (see below) and instead mark

  * python-qutip-core-doc
    Replaces: python-qutip-doc (<< 5.1.1-20)
    Conflicts: python-qutip-doc (<< 5.1.1-20)


No, precisely the opposite. I'm saying it is not constructive to create python-qutip-core-doc.



To migrate without having version issues, the idea is to implement the packages step by step. I will mark in `python3-qutip-core` like

  * python3-qutip-core
    Replaces: python3-qutip (<< 5.1.1-20)
    Conflicts: python3-qutip (<< 5.1.1-20)

So it should just possible to install one of them during migration.


Correction: I think here also a conflict required:
 * python3-qutip
   Replaces: python3-qutip-core (<< 5.1.1-20)
   Conflicts: python3-qutip-core (<< 5.1.1-20)

No, it would be the other way around.
python3-qutip-core replaces and conflicts with the previous python3-qutip.


If I have finished the packaging in the last step we can make `python3-qutip` to a pure metapackage which

  * python3-qutip
    Depends: python3-qutip-core
    Recommends: python3-qutip-{qip,qtrl,qoc},
    Suggests: python-qutip-{qip,qtrl,qoc}-doc

That should be fine.

Plan to stage the upgrade in experimental first.

Drew


Reply to: