Re: RFS: request for upload for several packages (frog,timbl,ucto)

[Joost van Baal-Ilić <joostvb-debian@mdcc.cx>]

For the record: I'm in touch with upstream about an issue with libfolia:

пет 24 19:56 < joostvb> gbp:error: Cannot find pristine tar commit for archive
                        'libfolia_2.21.orig.tar.gz'
 [20:09] [joostvb(+i)] [34:MeukNet/#lst(+nt)]

Bye,

Joost


On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 07:10:43PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> Hi Maarten,
> 
> just did:
> 
> joostvb@agni:~/git/opaque-store% dupload --to anonymous-ftp-master ../build-area/ticcutils_0.36-1_source.changes
> 
> no time for libfolia now.
> 
> HTH!
> 
> Bye,
> 
> Joost
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 03:57:17PM +0100, Maarten van Gompel wrote:
> > Hi Andreas et al,
> > 
> > Here's another update on this: it got pointed out to me that I had
> > actual upload rights for my packages and might not need a sponsor after
> > all (I'm in https://ftp-master.debian.org/dm.txt). So I prepared all the
> > packages again and ran dupload on them.
> > 
> > That seemed to go well, except I now got two rejections:
> > 
> > ticcutils_0.36-1_source.changes REJECTED
> >    ACL dm: NEW uploads are not allowed
> >    binary:libticcutils10 is NEW.
> > 
> > libfolia_2.21-1_source.changes REJECTED
> >    ACL dm: NEW uploads are not allowed
> >    binary:folialint is NEW.
> >    binary:libfolia22 is NEW.
> > 
> > All other packages got ACCEPTED (however, they rely on the rejected ones
> > so things won't work).
> > 
> > The package counts as new because of the SO-bump we did, but it seems I
> > don't have the permissions to upload that? I don't really know how to proceed
> > now anymore...
> > 
> > >> Since these packages are depending from the first one I did not
> > >> continued.  If you want to do your final sponsor a favour please
> > >> set the target distribution of those packages to "UNRELEASED" again
> > 
> > > Done, I reverted them to UNRELEASED and updated them (there was no
> > > routine-update in debian testing though, so I did it manually)
> > 
> > I had reverted the reversion again (can you still follow? they're back
> > to 'unstable' because I released them now). All 'debian/*' git tags are
> > also set and pushed now.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > Maarten van Gompel
> >     Digital Infrastructure, Humanities Cluster,
> >     Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen (KNAW)
> > 
> > web: https://proycon.anaproy.nl
> > gpg: 0x39FE11201A31555C
> 
>