Re: RFS: request for upload for several packages (frog,timbl,ucto)
Hi Maarten,
just did:
joostvb@agni:~/git/opaque-store% dupload --to anonymous-ftp-master ../build-area/ticcutils_0.36-1_source.changes
no time for libfolia now.
HTH!
Bye,
Joost
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 03:57:17PM +0100, Maarten van Gompel wrote:
> Hi Andreas et al,
>
> Here's another update on this: it got pointed out to me that I had
> actual upload rights for my packages and might not need a sponsor after
> all (I'm in https://ftp-master.debian.org/dm.txt). So I prepared all the
> packages again and ran dupload on them.
>
> That seemed to go well, except I now got two rejections:
>
> ticcutils_0.36-1_source.changes REJECTED
> ACL dm: NEW uploads are not allowed
> binary:libticcutils10 is NEW.
>
> libfolia_2.21-1_source.changes REJECTED
> ACL dm: NEW uploads are not allowed
> binary:folialint is NEW.
> binary:libfolia22 is NEW.
>
> All other packages got ACCEPTED (however, they rely on the rejected ones
> so things won't work).
>
> The package counts as new because of the SO-bump we did, but it seems I
> don't have the permissions to upload that? I don't really know how to proceed
> now anymore...
>
> >> Since these packages are depending from the first one I did not
> >> continued. If you want to do your final sponsor a favour please
> >> set the target distribution of those packages to "UNRELEASED" again
>
> > Done, I reverted them to UNRELEASED and updated them (there was no
> > routine-update in debian testing though, so I did it manually)
>
> I had reverted the reversion again (can you still follow? they're back
> to 'unstable' because I released them now). All 'debian/*' git tags are
> also set and pushed now.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
>
> Maarten van Gompel
> Digital Infrastructure, Humanities Cluster,
> Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen (KNAW)
>
> web: https://proycon.anaproy.nl
> gpg: 0x39FE11201A31555C
Reply to: