Re: numba
> I suggest enabling the build time tests again, and request binary
> removal on architectures where numba doesn't build.
yes
> i.e. disable the "failsafe" introduced here:
> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/numba/-/commit/3d08b6e6fe43400e7640de51d8e5afb5942d79ed
Agreed, we do not hide problems
> Look at the recent build log for s390x. It seems most tests are
> failing. Is numba useful at all on this architecture in this state?
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=numba&arch=s390x&ver=0.59.1%2Bdfsg-1&stamp=1719393837&raw=0
I would say if upstream does not support an architecture and we are not able to catch up... we do not have the manpower to solve this...
Reply to:
- References:
- numba
- From: PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
- Re: numba
- From: PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
- Re: numba
- From: Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org>
- Re: numba
- From: PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
- Re: numba
- From: Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org>
- Re: numba
- From: PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
- Re: numba
- From: Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org>
- Re: numba
- From: Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org>