Re: numba
I suggest enabling the build time tests again, and request binary
removal on architectures where numba doesn't build.
i.e. disable the "failsafe" introduced here:
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/numba/-/commit/3d08b6e6fe43400e7640de51d8e5afb5942d79ed
Look at the recent build log for s390x. It seems most tests are
failing. Is numba useful at all on this architecture in this state?
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=numba&arch=s390x&ver=0.59.1%2Bdfsg-1&stamp=1719393837&raw=0
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: numba
- From: PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
- Re: numba
- From: Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org>
- References:
- numba
- From: PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
- Re: numba
- From: Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org>
- Re: numba
- From: PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
- Re: numba
- From: Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org>
- Re: numba
- From: PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
- Re: numba
- From: Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org>
- Re: numba
- From: PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
- Re: numba
- From: Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org>