Re: Numba not in testing due to lots of autopkgtest errors - how to proceed
Hi Graham,
Am Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 08:40:23PM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs:
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 at 17:18, Andreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de> wrote:
> > It seems to me that build time tests are working and the failure is
> > just in autopkgtest. I'm drawing this conclusion from your latest
> > push to Salsa where amd64 and i386 were building successfully
> ...
> > I know that's cheating but there is no time for fiddling around here
> > any more. We are running the same test as at build-time where it is
> > passing so we can assume that numba works.
>
> The build time tests are probably only passing because of a similar
> "cheat" [1] committed in 2017.
Good catch!
I confirm that the log also shows some errors in the dh_auto_test part
of the log I created locally.
I admit I don't know what might be a good solution. Building to check
for failing tests takes ages on some decent hardware. Salsa CI has
trouble to build it reliably.
I have no idea whether numba should be considered a case for "if
Python3.11 does not work we should revert and release with Python3.10".
I do not see any real chance to fix all issues in numba right in time
for the freeze.
Kind regards
Andreas.
> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/numba/-/commit/3d08b6e6fe43400e7640de51d8e5afb5942d79ed
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: