On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 10:47:01PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Am Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 01:32:59AM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > > <Dropping upstream from CC) > > > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 11:17:38AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > Shayan, do you think you can fix this patch you once obtained from some > > > project that seems to have stalled since 9 years? Otherwise I'd tend to > > > remove the patch and thus the OCaml support again. > > > > I am interested in knowing as to why are we keeping ocaml support in the first place? > > In other words, what is the purpose of the patch? > > (Upstream project seems to be written in C) > > I'm in favour of droping the OCaml patch. I guess the Ocaml patch was needed for pplacer. Now pplacer FTBFS due to removed ocaml patch/binpkg. See Bug#1024889 We need to fix this before the cruft removal happens. > > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/mcl/-/blob/master/debian/patches/OCamlSupport.patch > > > [2] https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/mcl/-/jobs/3428232 -- Best, Nilesh
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature