On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 10:52:45AM -1000, Chiara Marmo wrote: > > I could push the package to new again, with a new revision > > > but I fear another CVE being discovered meanwhile and we run into > > circles. > > > > > Thanks Nilesh for the upload and your explanations. > > > > You can temporarily have a separate branch nominally targeting > > experimental, with docs included and version numbers along the lines of > > 1.2.0-1+doc or 1.2.0-1+exp1; subsequent uploads to unstable could either > > merge it or proceed with time-sensitive fixes, as appropriate. > > > > > Aaron, thanks for your suggestion. > Indeed I was wondering if it was possible to keep the packaging of the docs > in a different branch. +1 > If no objections from the list, I will create a new branch experimental > then, containing the docs. Go ahead! :) -- Best, Nilesh
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature