Hello Again, I had a quick. It looks great. I will upload by the next week-end because right now I am melting (and this can generate a chain of mistakes). Otherwise, have you try to process the texi with pdftex ? Best, Jerome On 21/07/2022 01:12, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hi Philip, Thanks for your work. I will have a look this week-en. Best wishes, Jerome On 21/07/2022 00:49, Philip Rinn wrote:Hi, my main goal was to make blitz++ reproducible - unfortunately that's not (easily) possible at the moment, as texi2pdf introduces the absolute path of included files into the resulting pdf :-/ Anyway, I guess it's good to get blitz++ in a better shape: blitz++ (1:1.0.2+ds-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Team upload * debian/control: - debhelper, bump to 13 - Standards Version, bump to 4.6.1 (no change) - Mark libblitz0v5 and libblitz0-dev as 'Multi-Arch: same' - Mark libblitz-doc as 'Multi-Arch: foreign' - Add 'Rules-Requires-Root: no' * Remove unused debian/source/include-binaries * Make bzconfig.h reproducible: - Remove -{file|debug}-prefix-map from BZ__compiler_options - Add patch to use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH in BZ__config_date (Closes: #977001) - Thanks Vagrant Cascadian for the patch - Add patch to use DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH as BZ__os_name (Closes: ##977003) - Thanks Vagrant Cascadian for the patch -- Philip Rinn <rinni@inventati.org> Wed, 20 Jul 2022 18:54:45 +0200 I could have pushed the changes to the repository directly but I thought it was politer to do it via a MR: https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/blitzxx/-/merge_requests/2 Could anyone of you please review and sponsor? Thanks & best regards Philip
-- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calculus@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature