Re: RFS: macaulay2 1.16.99 (experimental)

[Anton Gladky <gladk@debian.org>]

Hi Doug,

I have uploaded the package into experimental.

However CI-pipelines are failing for the package [1].
Could you please have a look, whether the package really fails
to build or it is a CI-issue?

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/macaulay2/-/pipelines/211610

Regards



Anton

Am Di., 15. Dez. 2020 um 13:31 Uhr schrieb Torrance, Douglas
<dtorrance@piedmont.edu>:
>
> The Macaulay2 developers just announced a new beta release (1.16.99).
> I've packaged it, targeting "experimental", in the "debian/experimental"
> branch at:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/macaulay2
>
> The previous upload of version 1.16 earlier this year failed to build on
> every architecture except for amd64 (!).  I believe we've fixed the main
> underlying issue (there was a segfault on architectures that default to
> unsigned char due to how the compiler was optimizing the string hashing
> function), but I'd like to see if it builds on all of the official
> architectures so we can iron any additional issues before the main 1.17
> release in a few weeks.  Ideally, we can get that into bullseye before
> the freeze.
>
> Would anyone be able to review and sponsor?
>
> Thanks!
> Doug
>
>