Re: RFS: keras, keras-applications, keras-preprocessing
Thank you very much for the upload Anton!
cheers,
Steve
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:41 PM Anton Gladky <gladk@debian.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> I have uploaded all packages. If they will be broken in the
> future and no upstream support available, they just need to
> be removed. You have done work, why to loose it at least right
> now....
>
> Thanks for contribution!
>
> Anton
>
> Am Di., 14. Apr. 2020 um 15:51 Uhr schrieb Stephen Sinclair
> <radarsat1@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hi Anton,
> >
> > Thanks for checking the package.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 7:48 AM Anton Gladky <gladky.anton@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Stephen,
> > >
> > > I started from keras yesterday, made some minor changes.
> > > But it seems some tests are failing:
> > >
> > > ========================= 14 failed, 812 passed, 252 skipped, 87
> > > warnings in 3054.59 seconds =========================
> > >
> > > Please check, whether they can be skipped or the tolerance
> > > should be increased.
> >
> > This is similar to the result I get if I run the tests without
> > including the updated keras-preprocessing and keras-applications
> > packages in my schroot, so I wonder if that's what happened.
> > However, I realized I forgot to *require* these updated packages by
> > increasing the versions in debian/control, so now I have done so.
> > Now on a fresh schroot without the updates the package fails to build,
> > with the updates it builds and passes tests for me.
> > I supplied the updated .debs using --extra-package options to sbuild,
> > as well as to autopkgtest.
> >
> > I have pushed a few commits on salsa master.
> >
> > That said, as of this month keras outside of Tensorflow is now
> > end-of-life, so I am not sure if it is worth keeping these packages in
> > debian:
> >
> > https://github.com/keras-team/keras/blob/master/README.md
> >
> > > Bugs present in multi-backend Keras will only be fixed until April 2020 (as part of minor releases).
> >
> > Perhaps a last update while things are still working, but removal on
> > breakage? Or better to just remove it entirely?
> > With theano also being end of life things are looking shaky.
> >
> > regards,
> > Steve
> >
> >
> > > Am Sa., 21. März 2020 um 15:40 Uhr schrieb Stephen Sinclair
> > > <radarsat1@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > Dear Science team,
> > > >
> > > > I decided to check up on my packages and found that there are errors
> > > > that have cropped up due to recent updates to Python and GCC. I
> > > > noticed that they will be autoremoved from testing soon, so I am
> > > > looking for a sponsor to upload some updates.
> > > >
> > > > In particular keras and siconos, but keras is more urgent as it will
> > > > be autoremoved on Monday. And, I am still working on fixing a problem
> > > > with swig4.0 in the siconos package.
> > > >
> > > > So, the following packages have been updated in salsa repositories:
> > > >
> > > > science-team/keras
> > > > science-team/keras-applications
> > > > science-team/keras-preprocessing
> > > >
> > > > Unfortunately my sponsor is no longer available, so I am looking for a
> > > > new sponsor to check and upload these packages.
> > > >
> > > > Note: the salsa CI fails for keras because it does not use the updated
> > > > keras-applications and keras-preprocessing, I am not sure how to make
> > > > that work.
> > > >
> > > > But, it is building and testing successfully on my machine.
> > > >
> > > > Would someone be willing to sponsor an upload of these packages?
> > > >
> > > > kind regards,
> > > > Steve
> > > >
Reply to: